| Applicant name | BUTYANOV AND OTHERS |
| Applicant type | Prisoner |
| Number of applicants | 37 |
| Country | Russia |
| Application no. | 36904/19 41841/19 20809/21 23768/21 24513/21 33095/21 36485/21 40042/21 44915/21 48431/21 48973/21 49774/21 50115/21 51000/21 53763/21 59342/21 59939/21 61034/21 917/22 1085/22 1547/22 2112/22 3558/22 4511/22 5361/22 6211/22 7052/22 8843/22 9341/22 9500/22 11164/22 11172/22 11781/22 14873/22 19613/22 25042/22 27726/22 30057/22 |
| Date | 01/02/2024 |
| Judges | Lorraine Schembri Orland, President, Frédéric Krenc, Davor Derenčinović |
| Institution | Court |
| Type | Judgment |
| Outcome Art. 8 | Violation |
| Reason | Mini-judgment |
| Type of privacy | Relational privacy; informational privacy |
| Keywords | |
| Facts of the case | Art. 8 (1) – restrictions on family visits in pre-trial facilities – refusal of long-term family visits (Resin v. Russia, no. 9348/14, §§ 39-41, 18 December 2018, and Pshibiyev and Berov v. Russia, no. 63748/13, §§ 43 54, 9 June 2020) Art. 8 (1) – permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities – in SIZO-4, Arkhangelsk Region, since 19/08/2016 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court: opposite sex operators, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room, detention in different cells with video surveillance, Art. 8 (1) – restrictions on family visits in pre-trial facilities – refusal of long-term family visits; |
| Analysis | |
| Other Article violation? | Yes, 3, 5, 6, 13, 14 and P1-3 |
| Damage awarded | 26050 (2 applicants) |
| Documents | Judgment |