Judgment 17157/16

Applicant name STOYANOVA
Applicant type natural person
Number of applicants 1
Country Bulgary
Application no.17157/16
Date 08/10/2024
Judges Jolien Schukking, présidente,
 Peeter Roosma,
 Diana Kovatcheva
Institution Court
Type Judgment
Outcome Art. 8 violation
Reason Positive obligation
Type of privacy Procedural privacy
Keywords Procedural requirments implicit
Facts of the case The applicant complains of the amounts, which she considers excessive, which she was ordered to pay as reimbursement of the defendant’s representation costs, even though her claim was found to be well-founded by the domestic courts.
  
AnalysisThe compensation awarded to the applicant in this case was reduced to nothing, and that the applicant was even ordered to pay an amount to the opposing party, due to the rules relating to the allocation of procedural costs in the event of partial dismissal of the action. For the considerations set out above under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention , the Court considers that the domestic proceedings did not provide the applicant with adequate compensation and redress the breach of her private life, despite the domestic courts’ recognition of that breach.   
Other Article violation? Yes, Article 6 ECHR
Damage awarded that the respondent State is to pay the applicant, within three months, EUR 2,000 (two thousand euros), plus any tax that may be chargeable on that sum, in respect of non-pecuniary damage, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of settlement 
Documents Judgment