Judgment 12431/22

Applicant name VESELÝ
Applicant type natural person
Number of applicants 1
Country THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Application no. 12431/22
Date 28/11/2024
Judges Andreas Zünd, President,
 Kateřina Šimáčková,
 Mykola Gnatovskyy
Institution Court
Type Judgment
Outcome Art. 8 violation
Reason Positive obligation
Type of privacy Bodily privacy; procedural privacy
Keywords Procedural requirments
Facts of the case The application concerns, in particular, the allegedly insufficient amount of compensation awarded to the applicant on account of medical malpractice (Article 8 of the Convention).
AnalysisIn the Court’s view, the amount of EUR 790 is considerably lower than the minimum level of compensation generally awarded by the Court in cases of medical malpractice in which it has found a violation of Article 8. Moreover, this disproportion is exacerbated by the fact that two-thirds of that award was ultimately absorbed by the sum that the applicant had to pay to the hospital for the legal fees incurred by it before the Supreme Court. In this regard, the Court observes that like the lower courts, which had exempted the applicant from court fees and had applied a special provision enabling them to refrain from awarding the defendant’s legal fees where the outcome of a case depended largely on the opinion of a medical expert, the Supreme Court ought to have taken account of the specific character of the proceedings before it, in which the applicant sought to protect his rights under Article 8.
Other Article violation?
Damage awarded Holds
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicant, within three months, the following amounts, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement:
(i) EUR 4,000 (four thousand euros), plus any tax that may be chargeable, in respect of non-pecuniary damage;
(ii) EUR 2,500 (two thousand five hundred euros), plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant, in respect of costs and expenses;
Documents Judgment