| Applicant name |
X.
|
| Applicant type |
Natural person (prisoner)
|
| Country |
The United Kingdom
|
| Decision no. |
3542/68 4099/69
|
| Date |
13/07/1970
|
| Judges |
–
|
| Institution |
Commission (Plenary)
|
| Type |
Decision
|
| Outcome Art. 8 |
Inadmissible
|
| Reason |
Six months rule
|
| Type of privacy |
Informational Privacy
|
| Keywords |
Correspondence prisoner delayed
|
| Facts of the case |
Prisoner was denied an appeal for leave; he complained to the Commission, but his application was rejected. Now, he submits that some of the documents he tried to send to the Commission were delayed, not due to his fault.
|
| Analysis |
The Commission restores the claim that was declared inadmissible earlier, but upon analysis, declares the claim inadmissible because the initial claim had been submitted beyond the six months limit.
|
| Documents |
Decision
|