Applicant name | PUKHTVENT AND OTHERS |
Applicant type | Natural person (prisoner) |
Number of applicants | 35 |
Country | Russia |
Application no. | 33236/18, 0654/18, 7601/19, 12326/19 37069/19, 46860/19, 47767/19, 53533/19 58035/19, 60606/19, 3766/20, 4796/20 26743/20, 48062/20, 3204/21, 4764/21 7566/21, 7567/21, 10846/21, 11705/21 12408/21, 12701/21, 18137/21, 18138/21 18869/21, 19440/21, 19943/21, 21424/21 24280/21, 26437/21, 26517/21, 27411/21 30219/21, 30768/21, 31702/21 |
Date | 14/12/2023 |
Judges | Peeter Roosma, President, Ioannis Ktistakis, Andreas Zünd |
Institution | Court |
Type | Judgment |
Outcome Art. 8 | Violation |
Reason | Unlawfull |
Type of privacy | Informational privacy |
Keywords | Surveillance |
Facts of the case | Art. 8 (1) – permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities – video surveillance from 22/12/2020 to 25/12/2020 during detention in disciplinary cell Art. 8 (1) – permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities – detention in different cells with video surveillance, surveillance by opposite-sex operators in IK-5 Krasnoyarsk Region since 08/06/2016 and until 14/12/2021; Art. 8 (1) – secret surveillance – in IK-25 Komi Republic since 21/01/2017: opposite-sex operators, detention in different cells with video surveillance, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room. Art. 8 (1) – permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities – in IK-5 Krasnoyarsk Region since 16/09/2019 and pending as of 16/09/2022 Art. 8 (1) – permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities – in IK-1 Komi Republic since 26/04/2016 by opposite-sex operators Art. 8 (1) – permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities – IK-25 Komi Republic, 12/04/2018 – pending as of 16/09/2022; opposite-sex operators, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room |
Analysis | Mini judgment |
Other Article violation? | Yes, many |
Damage awarded | 62250 to the applicants invokin 8 ECHR |
Documents | Judgment |