| Applicant name | A.H. |
| Applicant type | Natural person |
| Country | The United Kingdom |
| Decision no. | 3868/68 |
| Date | 25/05/1970 |
| Judges | Fawcett Susterhenn Ermacora Welter O’Donoghue Delahaye Busuttil Kellberg Daver |
| Institution | Commission |
| Type | Decision |
| Outcome Art. 8 | Inadmissible |
| Reason | Ratione materiae |
| Type of privacy | Informational privacy |
| Keywords | Public communication forwarded |
| Facts of the case | Person alleged abuse by police, inter alia, before a judge in a public hearing. |
| Analysis | The Commission finds that such is not covered by ARticle 8 ECHR. ‘These statements were originally made in the course of public proceedings and consequently the subsequent communication of them cannot constitutte an interference with the applicant’s right to respect of his private life within the meaning of Article 8 of the Convention.’ |
| Documents | Decision |