Applicant name | X. and Y. |
Applicant type | Natural person |
Country | The Netherlands |
Decision no. | 6753/74 |
Date | 19/12/1974 |
Judges | –
|
Institution | Commission |
Type | Decision |
Outcome Art. 8 | Inadmissible |
Reason | Manifestly ill-founded (health and morals) |
Type of privacy | Private life |
Keywords | Obligation to live with parents; even if |
Facts of the case | Adolescent has a boyfriend, which is disapproved of by her parents. She runs away with her boyfriend, but is returned to her parents by the police. |
Analysis | Interesting case because of a number of reasons.
1. First, the Commission uses the rationale of ‘health and morals’ as originally intended. |
Documents | Decision |