Applicant name | McMahon |
Applicant type | Prisoner |
Country | UK |
Decision no. | 7113/75 5947/72 6205/73 7052/75 7061/75 7107/75 7136/75 |
Date | 04/10/1977 |
Judges | – |
Institution | Commission |
Type | Decision |
Outcome Art. 8 | Admissible |
Reason | – |
Type of privacy | Correspondence |
Keywords | Arbitrary interference |
Facts of the case | Correspondence censored by prison authorities. |
Analysis | Prisoner claims that censorship served no legitimate interest and hence was aribtary. Commission suggests that this case, together with six other cases, should be dealt with in substance. |
Documents | Decision |