| Applicant name |
X.
|
| Applicant type |
Natural person (immigrant)
|
| Country |
Sweden
|
| Decision no. |
5525/72
|
| Date |
05/02/1973
|
| Judges |
–
|
| Institution |
Commission (Plenary)
|
| Type |
Decision
|
| Outcome Art. 8 |
Inadmissible
|
| Reason |
Exhaustion Domestic Remedies; No Interference
|
| Type of privacy |
Locational Privacy; Family Privacy; Informational Privacy
|
| Keywords |
Immigrant; Expulsion; Correspondence hindered; Documents seized
|
| Facts of the case |
The applicant complains about the seizure by the police of certain documents and other private property belonging to him and the alleged failure of the police to return this property. The applicant has further complained of the alleged delay in delivering certain letters to him and of the detrimental effects on him and his fiancée by reason of his having to live under the threat of the expulsion order.
|
| Analysis |
With respect to the first part of his claim, he has not exhausted all domestic remedies. With respect to the second part of his claim, the Commission was not presented with any evidence of an interference.
|
| Documents |
Decision
|