| Applicant name |
X.
|
| Applicant type |
Natural Person (prisoner)
|
| Country |
Austria
|
| Decision no. |
2676/65
|
| Date |
03/04/1967
|
| Judges |
–
|
| Institution |
Commission (Plenary)
|
| Type |
Decision
|
| Outcome Art. 8 |
Inadmissible
|
| Reason |
Manifestly ill-founded; Ratione materiae
|
| Type of privacy |
Family Privacy
|
| Keywords |
Prisoner; right to family life
|
| Facts of the case |
Applicant complains of the hardship caused to his wife and children as a result of his detention.
|
| Analysis |
The Commission stresses that the separation of a prisoner from his family and the hardship resulting from it are inherent consequences of the execution of a sentence and that therefore, an examination of this complaint does not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set forth in the Convention.
|
| Documents |
Decision
|