Applicant name | X. and Y,. |
Applicant type | Natural Person |
Country | Germany |
Decision no. | 2625/65 |
Date | 30/09/1968 |
Judges | –
|
Institution | Commission |
Type | Decision |
Outcome Art. 8 | Inadmissible |
Reason | Abuse of Right |
Type of privacy | ? |
Keywords | ? |
Facts of the case | Unclear |
Analysis | Man complains about the state being against him on many points, without making clear what he means. Court dismisses his claim for abuse of right, both because of the abuse language he uses and because his applications does not make clear any substantial point, and so must be considered frivolous. |
Documents | Decision |